How a society could improve its functionality Essay

How a ordering could improve its functionality - Essay ExampleOne of the huge-run benefits of this possibility is that behaviours argon improved to suit the majority after they are treated with. Therefore, deviant behaviours that dissipate the favorable norms are then adjusted to be capable of bonding much more strongly to the society. Deviation that takes pip in any society is because people experience different types of social pressure, that cut back the preferences when an individual performing any action practic eachy (Howe, 1987).Lately, it was becoming increasingly doubtful whether this theory willing ever see the psycho-social view. The reason is that Goldschmidt discussed in the book the anti-historic approach made it impossible to examine social processes, rejection of psychology made it impossible to understand attitudes and sentiments, and the rejection of culture led to a lack of recognition of the bionomic context . Thus, now the fixers approach social systems i n all three types psycho-socially, behaviourally and/or functionally (Howe, 1987). Psychoanalysis helps by reflecting the situations a person faced during his/her childhood and behaviourally it is concentrating on problems during that time period. While sociologically, functionalism ensures that social order doesnt rule stability as Brown defines in his book. The continuity of the social structure is not destroyed by changes in the units. People, who have been isolated by the society, are treated by helping them develop the birth with the society. Fixers of the society face problems like individually induced pathology, systems failure and others.Whereas, the limitations faced by fixer theory is preferably concerned with the scientific methods, which is arguable, as uses implies that the people living in the physical world are objectively real. It can be successfully observed through conducting social analysis or interviews. Conversely, if the society lacks the consistency to stab ilize the culturally suitable behaviours or norms, there are several social simplicity mechanisms which restore this conformity. The control mechanisms ensure functional consistency, by restoring it or isolating the ones who dont obey the rules. But jibe to Brown this limits the value of human rights to live as they would like to. They are seen merely as objects rather than individuals.The functionalist theory is oblivious to the natural and historical process, so it assumes that societies are meant to be in equilibrium. This helped the functionalists to predict the place of an individual in a social system along with the expectations which are supposed to be fulfilled. In other words, it means that every individuals behaviour can be predicted scientifically In spite of all this, sociologists believe that they can understand the laws, which define the behaviours of a society. Although, this serves as an incentive for further research on this subject, while the objective analysis m ay not completely comprehend the social phenomena in the long run.ReferencesHowe. D. 1987. Introduction to Social Work Theory. Revised Edition. UK. Publisher Ashgate.Brown. R & Kuper.A. 1977. The Social Anthropology of Radcliffe-Brown. Edition